Believing what you see on video interviews could be your downfall

Hiring the wrong person is a catastrophe that can cost the company money and you the loss of your job. Post COVID we have been relying on video calls to substitute for the in-person reality check. Unfortunately, it isn’t easy to gauge a person’s soft skills, ability to influence or likelihood of merging into the company culture on the video call.

Last week, I received several calls from past and current clients admitting that the virtual interview was missing the capability to assess technical and soft skills. I suggested the development of an assessment. I have long been a believer in interviewing assessments to fill gaps that the interviewing process leaves behind. My advice always is to include an evaluation in the process. I suggested that the client build scenarios or a case study in advance and present on the call with the interview. Doing this allows you to see the logic used, presentation skills, soft skills, process skills and ability to perform under pressure. The results help you quickly learn how the candidate manages under pressure and aligns with the overall company values. It also allows you to confirm what you are thinking.

The reaction from candidates is sometimes surprising. I experienced a candidate who had not done any preparation. He said, “I can out PowerPoint anyone; let’s just talk about it.” We closely observed him, and the interviewing group concluded that the candidate was lazy and did not prepare for the session. In another instance, we had some math required in problem-solving a real-life case study simulation. When we spoke to the candidate, she responded that she had not done the case study indicating “math was for the subordinates to do.”  The last case is a male candidate who presented and displayed that he was a good presenter; however, the presentation revealed some gender bias toward women in the workforce. I am convinced that we would not have discovered this in a simple video interview.

In summary, it is essential to augment your video interview with simulations, scenarios and case studies to discover the natural person behind the screen.

Are you hiring the best person for the job?


Reputation Damage in the RFP Process

Do you consider reputation damage in the Request for Proposal (RFP) process for your organization? Most companies have a process for managing the RFP but fail to realize an RFP could ruin your personal and company’s reputation and increase cost in the long term. Here are three mistakes I’ve seen over the years.

Conflicts of Interest

Many suppliers spend 40 – 80 hours building a proposal. They align their business capability to the customer’s business requirement, usually involve the entire organization in the process, and determine the cost and acceptable margin for meeting the specification. One aspect of the supplier’s decision is to decide if there is innovation or features that will offer the buying firm completive advantage.

As a supplier, you expect that the buying company has issued the bid in good faith and will treat the information as confidential. Working with clients, I have seen several RFPs where individuals involved in the bidding event had a conflict of interest with the some of the bidders. It is safe to say that much of the information from the supplier’s bid was shared with competitors. Conflicts of interest must always be declared! Had the clients known about the conflicts, they would have chosen not to bid.

Asking a supplier to participate in the RFP Process, when there is no real intent to do business with them.

Suppliers may be aggressive when they get a new opportunity to participate in an RFP, however, if they are unsuccessful, they may not want to participate again once they realize that they were exploited. One client had a contract with a supplier allowing them to bid at the end of the second year of a three-year contract with the provision that the client handover the lowest bid for the right of first refusal. The total sales on the contract were $6,000,000 and one of the bidders worked hard to submit an innovative proposal with a savings of $1,000,000. The client company complied with the incumbent contract and handed the competitor’s bid to the incumbent supplier who then met the challenge and reduced the cost by $1,000,000. When the industry consolidated a few years later to those two suppliers, the supplier who worked so hard and lost the bid refused to bid again.  This left only one supplier bidding on a high-volume strategic component. This situation lasted 17 years until the VP of Sales for the once exploited supplier retired.

Never ask a supplier to bid when there is no chance they can win the business! Of course, it’s never ethical to divulge another supplier’s pricing.

Failure to communicate and meet commitments

I always create a process and timeline when I create RFPs. As a rule, I communicate to all of the bidders the details relating to the bidding process and timeline.  I like to have conference calls or meetings to include all of the bidders. I typically include all of the bidders, advise them of the pending process, timelines, and address any questions.

It is essential to make sure that the process is fair, the timeline is detailed, and the objectives are clear. To be effective, you must manage the RFP as a project by meeting the milestones and timeline. Many procurement professionals lose credibility when they fail to deliver the RFP and results on time. If there are any necessary changes, it should be reported to the suppliers as soon as you know. Finally, the worst thing that you can do is award the contract and fail to brief the unsuccessful bidders. There are several reasons that this is poor practice; suppliers have spent much time preparing these bids and deserve to know where they fell short on the proposal. I don’t recommend providing precise detail, but some direction. It will set them up for success should they bid again in the future.

The Request for Proposal is one of the essential tools in the buyer’s toolbox.  If the request for proposal is done correctly, it can enhance relationships, lower cost, bring innovation, and create a strong supply chain. If done incorrectly, it can leave suppliers feeling exploited, damage your and your business’s reputation, damage relationships and cost your firm considerably.  These three mistakes to avoid can make a difference in your career.

Is reputation a consideration in your RFP process?

Supply chain and Procurement – The Decade in Review and Key Strategies for the Decade Ahead

Current State of Procurement
Working with some of the world’s best companies has given me a good view of procurement and supply chain over the years. As we exit 2019, we’ve made much progress, elevating the importance and status of our profession. Many firms have clearly articulated strategies that deliver year on year price reductions, restructured operations to separate transactional activity from strategic activity, and have designed multiple supply networks to meet the needs of specific market segments.

Overall, as procurement professionals, we have failed to progress developing rigorous category strategies, planning, and fail to optimize the opportunities available from detailed plans and well-executed cross-business/cross-functional business category strategies. Many of the firms I have visited in the last three years are just now embarking on developing a category planning approach. Many companies are still working with a centric, functional approach rather than recognizing that procurement is a business-wide process. Many businesses tend to have an annual, sometimes even quarter by quarter, business horizon rather than a forward-looking multi-year strategy. Many firms have not sufficiently invested to leverage technology to manage the current state and are in no position to look to the future state where data analytics and digital disruption will be a way of life. With robotic process automation, the internet of things, and automation with Artificial Intelligence are considered futuristic, and the reality is that they are here now. Data scientists are in high demand among progressive procurement, and supply chain-oriented companies.

The most surprising thing to me is that most companies do not have detailed maps of the suppliers in the supply chain. For me, this is some of the most critical intel a procurement or supply chain executive must have. It is impossible to have social responsibility, anti-slavery/forced labor, environmental or risk management programs without knowing all the suppliers in the supply chain. Knowing just the suppliers in tier one is not enough.

While we have made significant progress in the past decade, the challenges of a rapidly changing environment will force our firms to have renewed strategies that are forward-looking. The days where we chased low-cost labor around the globe are in our rear view. Far too often found out too late that our source of low labor costs put us at risk from natural disasters, political regulation and was temporary at best as standards of living are on the rise. In all cases, automation offsets low-cost labor. Robots work 24 hours a day, 24/7, never get tired or sick, and quality and productivity are consistent. Another lesson is that many organizations are building facilities close to the markets they serve in smaller footprints, making the supply chains more secure, agile, and flexible.

Strategies for the next decade

  • Enhance category management and develop robust strategies that are forward-thinking
  • Redesign the procurement process with the understanding that is a business-wide process with many owners, not a functional activity
  • Invest in bringing the technology up to manage the current state. Many companies are reluctant to invest in technology. Failure to do so will put the company at a competitive disadvantage and perhaps extinct
  • Build a TCO approach focused on total value. You could be getting low prices but higher production or management costs
  • Develop full supply chain maps of the supply chain along with real social responsibility and risk management programs
  • Provide the procurement teams with a comprehensive business orientation; in the past decade some organizations have compartmentalized jobs. When this is the case, individuals and groups fail to understand the business, company, and business strategies.
  • Manage succession planning and develop bench strength and a continuous recruiting
  • Develop a supplier relationship management program that rewards innovation, speed to market, business alignment and value contribution
  • Develop the individuals and teams in your business. Many groups need a program that goes back to basics and develops the population to build, drive and execute well-planned category strategies
  • Develop and train procurement leaders to look forward and create new processes, systems, and comprehensive business programs to cope with digitization, disruption, rapid product change, and supply chain agility

The changes I have seen in procurement have been challenging, exciting, and thought-provoking. The reality is that we are at the crossroads of change. While you may not agree with the current state of procurement and strategies for the future, I urge you to assess your organization and make a strategic commitment for the decade ahead.

Are you ready for the 2020s?

5 Things Business Can Teach Politicians About Negotiation

I try to avoid politics in my blog, but after listening to politicians’ recounts of the negotiations now being held in Washington, I’m compelled share these suggestions from my years of experience negotiating and teaching negotiation skills.

  1. Tactical or Strategic – Is the negotiation tactical with no real impact or is it strategic? If tactical, it tends to be focused on the short term and has no real impact on the organization. If strategic. It’s best to develop guiding principles. People who dig into their positions tend to dig in so deep that the result is deadlock. People who explore the interests behind positions and work to establish guiding principles can find options and solutions.
  2. BATNA –Even someone with basic skills is taught to never enter a negotiation without a BATNA (best alternative to no/negotiated agreement). Failure to do so leads to deadlock, poor relationships and the inability to move forward.
  3. ZOPA -Every entry level negotiator is taught to analyze the situation, develop many options and calculate a ZOPA (zone of possible agreement) to be the focus on where positions can intersect.
  4. Competence and Capability – The parties need to be competent and capable to represent the interest of their stakeholders, while developing a solution that satisfies both parties and improves the overall organization.
  5. Ego – Make the negotiation about issues and solutions. Keep your ego in check and work in problem solving mode.

Unfortunately, if the negotiation involves two parties with big egos without the objective to solve, the negotiators can appear like children who take their toys home when they don’t get their way. In this case it’s best to start over with new teams who don’t carry baggage to the event. In business you change out the teams; it is possible for politicians to put a team together to work to an acceptable solution.

Can politicians step back and learn from business?

Cutting Costs is Not a Sustainable Strategy: Five truths about business

December is always a time of reflection for me. I especially thank all of my customers and personal relationships for their commitment, ability to drive me with challenges, input into my thinking and most of all friendship.

I also think about what I’ve learned. After thinking about the last couple years, I ask what are the factors that make some businesses thrive, while others barely survive. Below are five things I have learned about business.

  1. The customer must be the priority – without customers, there is no business. It’s surprising how many organizations focus internally and forget about the customer. Having witnessed this in many organizations, I committed myself to a customer-first approach. If what you’re doing is not good for the customer, it’s not worth doing!
  2. The Top Line matters – Top line revenue growth is the lifeline in any business. If you do not have a good strategic plan that can deliver the needed revenue, your business will suffer and die. I witnessed a CEO who altered the business strategy three times in one year. To compensate for the inability to get top-line growth, it was necessary for him to make massive cuts in the business, lose the talent that made the business a success and attempt to cut his way to profitability. Cutting costs is not a sustainable strategy.
  3. Innovation drives competitive advantage – If you are not reconfiguring your business and creating change on a regular basis, you will fall far behind your competition. Long gone are the days where an organization can become complacent and live on the activities and products of the past. Many businesses have fallen victim to innovative disruption in their businesses unfortunately, they are now extinct or dying. Change, new products and innovation drive competitive advantage.
  4. The best talent provides the best solutions – The organization that can attract and retain the best talent will win the market. People that are analytical, hard-driving smart loyal, logical, and challenged will continually refresh their market offering, understand the markets they operate in and offer the best products and solutions. Without energetic, creative teams, the business will lose the competitive race, the best talent brings the best ideas.
  5. Focus on the external environment – Market changes, disruption, and agility will keep your company in the game. When companies are internally focused, they miss the significant opportunities that will propel them into new markets, acquisitions, and products.

These are things that I have learned in over 25 years of building or running businesses. Some I have learned through my education in business and others the hard way. I hope that they add value to someone that may be starting a career running a business or in a position to influence.

Best wishes for a Happy and healthy New Year!

Risky Business-Building a Procurement Strategic Plan for 2019

It is difficult to build a strategic plan in most years, but looking forward to 2019/2020 there is a great deal of uncertainty. With the threat of trade wars, tariffs, rising prices, labor shortages, and disruptive innovation, many sourcing professionals are tossing the dice and hoping for the best. Some industries like construction, automotive, electronics and appliances are looking great through the end of 2018, but are seeing a slowing of orders and consumer demand for 2019.

Many of the experienced sourcing professionals can read the tea leaves and see suppliers pushing to turn the long-term buyer’s market to a seller’s market by an onslaught of requests for price increases citing everything from tariffs, labor and healthcare to justify the increased pricing. The successful elimination of avoidable price increases requires both a proactive and reactive approach to cost containment. The worst thing you can do is take an ad hoc approach or fail to create a plan of action. If you fail to plan, you plan to fail.

In the process described below, steps 1 through 3 are the preemptive phase and steps 4 through 9 are the reactive phase of the price increase staircase.

Preemptive cost containment
The Preemptive phase of a supplier price increase is designed to shape and change supplier expectations so they do not to attempt to raise the price to your company.

Step 1: Predict your exposure
Understand the marketplace in which you are operating. What are the potential drivers of a supplier’s request for an increase, and when will they drive the supplier to request the price increase? Ideally, you will have done a cost analysis, breaking apart the supplier’s cost to understand the cost drivers of material, labor, overhead and profit. If you are unable to do a full cost analysis, you may have done a price analysis. You and your company will be in the best position to challenge the increase.

Step 2: Ward off potential requests
Requesting a forecast of future price movements from a supplier to inform the organization’s budgeting process can be damaging. This allows suppliers to groom the organization to expect a certain level of increase and you to be pleased when the supplier asks for less. Supply management professionals must turn the tables and groom suppliers to accept the principles of continuous improvement and expect reduced costs and prices. The first agenda item for every supplier meeting should be cost and value improvement. The astute supply management professional will always reply to a “Dear Valued Customer” price increase letter with a firm return letter conditioning against the increase.

Make the process of requesting an increase “difficult,” requiring the sales representative to work hard. Demand three months’ notice, in writing, of all increase requests and insist that the invoices are accompanied by a detailed statement of the actions the supplier has taken to reduce or eliminate the need for an increase. Similarly, a rigorous internal approval system will deter supply management professionals from accepting increases without challenge because of time pressure or the desire for a quiet life. Such a program of deterrence should put the supplier on alert that price increases require approvals and that the supplier must genuinely face margin erosion for a price increase to be considered.

Step 3: Anticipate and block the increase
The supply management professional must be armed with a forecast and planned activities to pre-empt requests. Investigate alternative materials, specifications, and suppliers. In highly competitive supply chains and supply markets, it may be possible to prepare the issue of an RFI, RFQ, RFP or auction immediately before the forecasted request arriving. Gather data about suppliers that are planning increases. Have their volumes gone up (over recovery of overheads), have they built a new facility (improved productivity)? Is there a rationale for demanding a reduction ahead of their request? Offer an extension to the current contract if prices remain stable. Whatever strategy you employ, don’t sit and wait for the price request to hit your desk.

Reactive cost containment
After the supplier has sent notification of a price increase, you should take the following actions.

Step 4: Respond
It is appropriate to quickly react negatively to a supplier’s announcement of a price increase; however, delaying a personal meeting to discuss the increased pricing is a good tactic. It is essential to emphasize that cost and value improvement, not price escalation, is company policy. In the communication to the supplier:

  • Refer to the principles under which the relationship was founded (and operates)
  • Offer to work together to identify the cause and work jointly to remove and contain future increases
  • Assure that you have continuous improvement clauses in all of your agreements
  • Provide contract language indicating that all price increases require justification with factual data supporting any requests
  • Specify notice periods of 90+ days
  • Use longer payment terms to your advantage

Step 5: Oppose
If the supplier persists, base your responses upon objective data drawn from research of the cost drivers. In competitive markets, you should use the leverage from supplier rationalization and item rationalization in the competitive market.

Use the information gathered for developing preemptive action to support your view that no increase is needed. Let the supplier try to “break” your analysis rather than justify rationally for the rise. In this way, you control the agenda and are likely to reveal more information about the supplier’s cost base that would be exposed otherwise. Any costs within the supplier’s absolute control require a rigorous challenge. It is also critical to challenge that labor increases with an offset by productivity and automation.

Step 6: Corroborate
Use external sources to validate the factors claimed to contribute to the increase. If material costs are involved, sources such as CIPS-Supply Management reports can be used to confirm the movements claimed. Be aware that changes in yield/waste (continuous improvement) will be a crucial part of such validation activity. It is not sufficient to say that material Y has gone up by 5 percent; you should question whether materials have changed, reduced, light-weighted or substituted.

Step 7: Eliminate or minimize
If some level of increase appears unavoidable, then look for offsetting additional value from the supplier. Postponing the implementation of the increase by six months will halve its fiscal year impact and may “buy” valuable time to develop further tactics to avoid its effects. Other options are to lengthen payment terms, set up consignment stocks or increase year-end rebates. The sales representative will, in all likelihood, be measured only on the increase in headline prices achieved, so offsetting tactics can prove very productive.

By this stage, the supplier should understand that any negotiation is going to be difficult and underpinned by facts and data. If you are operating with a single source, it may be worthwhile introducing a cost variation clause, to provide a set of principles that govern cost and price movement.

Make it clear that any movement negotiated will remain in force until costs dictate a change, up or down, rather than for a specified period (such as 12 months). In a competitive market, however, you may wish to agree to fixed prices for a period as a buffer from anticipated cost increases. Always negotiate increased value if you are forced to accept a price increase. You can negotiate innovation, higher safety stocks, free storage, drop trailers, more top-grade materials quality improvements, and any other value component available to offset the price increase.

The critical message to drive home to suppliers is that price increase requests will not be considered merely because a specified period has elapsed. Break the cycle of annual demands for a price increase.

Step 8: Keep track and record
While price increases are not good news, they are important news. Price increases should be reported as part of supply management performance, as should cost containment achieved throughout active resistance. Such cost containment (the difference between formal requests and what was agreed) involves significant resource and yet is often invisible in management reports. If containment goes unreported, the actual contribution of supply management to a business will never be fully appreciated.

While there is no guarantee that inflation will show its ugly head, it is always best to be prepared and have a strategy when it does. There is little doubt that Savvy Sourcing Professionals will include the proactive and reactive approaches in the strategic planning process along with plans to rationalize SKU’s and suppliers if the economic conditions change.

What’s your plan?

Emotional Intelligence and Curiosity–two things to look for when recruiting procurement professionals

Over the years I have been involved in recruiting campaigns for all levels of procurement. It is interesting that candidates and employers only focus on the tactical and strategic fundamentals of world class procurement. While understanding the fundamentals is desired, they can be easily taught to an intelligent person willing to learn. Recently I was meeting with a group of sourcing and procurement leaders and all agreed that two qualities stand far above the others, but are often ignored.

Savvy Procurement leaders know that curiosity and emotional intelligence are the two qualities that make a difference between success and failure in recruiting the best people in procurement. Curiosity is critical when evaluating suppliers, relationships, manufacturing processes, service provider performance, inventories, supply markets, economics and everything that makes the procurement job dynamic. If a procurement professional does not dig into the process, cost, global supply markets and everything about what they are buying, they will be of limited value in driving strategic solutions to every day procurement problems. It is the curiosity that drives out-of-the-box thinking to create innovation and new solutions to old problems.

Emotional Intelligence is hard to describe. It is something inside each one of us that manages how we navigate social complexities, manage behavior and make decisions leading to positive results. Experts have analyzed the things that drive emotional intelligence.

Self-awareness can be described as understanding and perceiving your emotions with a constant awareness of your reaction to situations. It is critical that anyone involved in sourcing and procurement understand how they are perceived by their organization and suppliers.

Social Competence
This can best be described as understanding your own social awareness and relationship skills and sensing others mood, behavior and motives. This is critical if the procurement professional is to be successful. Relationship skills, trustworthiness, collaboration and behavior will all impact the quality of relationships built in the course of business.

Procurement is a dynamic profession, where many changes in the economy, manufacturing processes, supply network, company politics can cause frustration. It’s essential that procurement and sourcing professionals remain flexible and adaptable as things can change daily and, in some cases, hourly. If people get too attached to particular processes and suppliers and fail to be adaptable, it could be a disaster to the company and their career.

Understanding emotions and being in control, no matter how volatile the situation, is critical to managing procurement and sourcing activities. If people can maintain emotional control, they are more likely to maintain clear thinking and meet the challenges before them.

I think that many recruiters and procurement leaders are seriously missing the mark if they look for technical procurement and business skills without considering emotional intelligence and curiosity as key components of the recruiting process. It’s my experience that these skills will be tough to bring out in a 30 minute interview. They require a well-planned assessment center, designed with a case study approach, social interactions and tough planned interviews designed to assess the candidate.

How will you look for EI and Curiosity in your candidate selection?

How procurement leaders can enhance executive presence

10 suggestions for developing presence

The recognition that procurement and supply chain management are strategic to the success of businesses puts us in the spotlight with senior management. While technical and commercial skills help procurement professionals drive significant revenue and value from supply chain, executive presence helps them get their own seat at the table.

A few weeks ago, while teaching a class in the automotive industry, I asked the participants to look at the company’s procurement cost savings goal and the value contribution that was expected in the current fiscal year. Then I asked them to look at the company’s margin percentage and identify what level of incremental sales would be needed to make a similar contribution to the company’s profit margin. Like many cases when I ask this question, the response was that sales would have to achieve several billion dollars in incremental sales to achieve the same impact. This is why procurement professionals are being asked to:

  • Deliver real value
  • Collaborate internally and externally
  • Build implementable strategies that continue to deliver value year on year
  • Influence and inspire stakeholders
  • Change styles and appeal to executives in complex matrix organization structures
  • Adopt styles that meet the business needs of stakeholders in a global framework
  • Move away from speaking procurement and tighten up messages for an executive audience
  • Understand and develop political skills for the boardroom

With this in mind, I conducted an informal survey among some of the CEOs and CFOs about the readiness of their senior procurement staff to move into leadership roles that lead to running the company in the future. To my amazement, their response was that many of their teams lack executive presence and influencing skills.

It is essential to find champions, mentors and stakeholder support in any business. When dealing with complex organizations and difficult strategies, gaining alignment of the businesses will assure success. No one survives with a death by PowerPoint style in a Twitter world. Building frameworks that detail opportunities, benefits, cost and risk are the language of business.

Here are 10 suggestions that will help you enhance your executive presence:

  1. Connect with your audience and know their pain points
  2. Present your proposal with a TED-like talk
  3. Hone the message for your executive audience
  4. Speak with commitment, passion and energy
  5. Don’t stick to one method of persuasion; adjust your style to the audience
  6. Focus on active listening and engagement
  7. Be confident
  8. Use facts and data
  9. Anticipate what questions will be asked in advance
  10. Look the part

Mastering these skills will increase confidence that you have the capability for key leadership roles. But, don’t forget you must earn trust by saying what you’ll do, then doing what you say.

Technical competence gets attention, but executive presence gets the seat at the table.

A change is in the wind; time to check the battens

They say it comes in like a lion and March 2018 is no exception. President Trump announced he will apply across-the-board tariffs or import taxes on steel and aluminum. Trump argues that the measures are necessary to protect U.S. national security. Generally, the consensus is the impact of this will be increased prices for consumers of steel and aluminum. While the full impact has not yet been analyzed by many companies while they await the final ruling, category managers for steel, should be building an analysis of capacity, securing domestic supplies and reviewing all contracts to minimize the immediate effect of this action.

Wages are on the rise and the Federal Reserve is conditioning us that interest rates will be rising as the economy heats up. This situation translates to price increases from suppliers who have funded extended payment terms while money was virtually free. Are you prepared?

Many suppliers have an inventory position on steel, so it’s prudent to conduct an analysis of inventory carrying cost vs a 25% increase due to tariffs. This would require a rapid action, should the analysis validate a decision for increased inventory.

When it comes to cost containment, it’s critical to constantly update category portfolios, monitor cost inputs and proactively condition suppliers against raising prices. Savvy category managers keep cost profiles up to date and have data readily available to challenge the price increases to ensure that if increases are warranted, they are pass-through and not an opportunity for suppliers to increase margins.

Many category managers have not lived through a time where sellers have power in the market place. I believe that time is around the corner.

Dust off the cost containment tool kit and prepare for the changing winds.

Are you prepared if the advisory is raised to a warning to batten down the hatches?

The cost of soft skills

I read an article that reminded me of an incident that is worth sharing. I was working in a very large food company and as a consultant and we recommended a new organization structure for procurement. We had evaluated a purchasing director who was talented, respected by his team and technically very good. As I approached the CEO and recommended the employee for the promotion, he objected and responded, “no way”. We discussed the employee and he agreed that my observation of his skills was correct. Then the CEO commented that the employee gave an awful presentation in front of his team and lost credibility. He was concerned that the senior staff would be disappointed with the appointment. The decision was made to recruit from outside the company.

Sometimes you only have one chance to make a first impression. Many of us are not comfortable making presentation or speaking in front of large crowds. While this is a soft skill it is essential for success in a career in procurement or supply chain. The ability to logically present a business case, influence and persuade others could help you to either elevate or sink your career. When conducting training classes, I often encourage all participants to take the leadership role and make presentations for the team. I’m always surprised that many people are comfortable taking a back seat when it comes to presentations. I’ve had people outright refuse to participate. Once a participant told me, “I don’t do presentations.” Unfortunately that was said in front of an HR and Management representatives auditing the class. I don’t think they survived the incident. The class room and meetings with peers are perfect places to perfect this critical skill.

The moral of this story is that everyone needs to take inventory of the soft skills and develop them. Business presentations are a critical skill, don’t neglect it.

Will the soft skills enhance or sink your career?